Quote Originally Posted by Gotch View Post
In it's purest form JKD isn't a style at all but an approach to training, absorb what is useful to the individual from any given style and discard the rest. In theory this would be perfect for mma fighters, but in practice JKD nearly always becomes a style with instructors attempting to form their students into copies of themselves.
Yup, thats the rub. Lee would shit if he saw some of these instructors trying to impose their own JKD style on their students. I believe that every MMA fighter or person who trains in general should determine their own striking style. Whether its more boxing-based, kickboxing based, Muay Thai, etc... You have to develop your own unique style to be successful. If you look at the best MMA fighters, they all have their own personal style that leads to incredible success.
Look at Anderson Silva's striking. Yes, his Muay Thai base is evident, but the Capoeria moves he has incorporated have made him almost impossible to outstrike. His timing is impeccable, his movements are out of this world, and most of that comes from Capoeria. The knees and elbows with the Plum are straight Muay Thai, but his approach to landing those positions are formed over many disciplines.

I don't follow MMA real closely these days, but the clips I've seen of Brock training his striking he lacked "flow", everything was stiff and mechanical and few if any practical combinations.
Stiff is exactly how I see it. I mentioned that in my post as well, he did not allow himself to become loose and fluid. A top shelf MMA fighter has to be comfortable in their approach and be able to move and flow with any attack. Its like trying to teach someone to build a boat from a book. Yes, they would have all the technical skills needed to build the boat but it would be almost impossible for them to actually build the boat.

Barnett is a tough guy and very skilled. If you watch some of the youtube vids of him teaching seminars for coach Robinson you realize how much more technical Robinson's knowledge of submission is than Barnett's or nearly anyone else I've ever seen. I remember back in the day when Sakuraba was destroying everyone in front of him including four members of the Gracie family some pictures that obviously were taken in secret were posted on the underground forum of Sakuraba training at Takada dojo with the windows blacked out and coach Robinson sitting in a chair in the ring with him and his training partners instructing him.
I believe Barnett is as close to your style of catch fighters as we will ever see, and he is the last of the dying breed. People believe you HAVE to have a jiu-jitsu base to submission grapple, but its proven that catch can be as effective if not more than BJJ or JJJ (Japanese Jiu-Jitsu). Barnett has been a top 5 HW for almost 10 years now, and has never been ran over by any fighter because of his heart and skill. His resume looks bad with the three losses to Mirko, but CC is the worst possible matchup for Josh. I love watching Barnett fight because he is constantly active and never coasts. He is also tough as nails, look at the beatings Mirko put on him and he never quit. Aleks E also put a beating on him before Barnett subbed him. I was shocked at how easily he tossed around 280 pound Brett Rogers too, his strength and striking defense are deceptively good.

But Saku is maybe the best grappler in MMA history for his time. Guys like Roger Gracie and Jacare have won Abu Dhabi and other big competitions but have not been able to incorporate their grappling into MMA as seamlessly as Saku. He was able to become the first MMA superstar because he relied on pure catch grappling. Watching his reverse figure fours and such against the Gracies should have proven to everyone that catch could defeat BJJ, but since Royce and them won the early UFCs in the US, BJJ caught on.

People also forget that Sakuraba won a UFC tournament, UFC Japan.